Our ControlTalk NOW chief technologist from Silicon Valley, Therese Sullivan, owner and editor of BuildingContext.me, recently brought the ControlTrends Community on-line with the concept of contextualization. This is a re-posting of Therese’s December 2013, prescient article foreshadowing the driving forces and impact of contextualization.
Last month I felt secure in describing Nest as a company comfortably traveling along in Apple’s orbit. I even linked to Matt Turck’s November TechCrunch article “Battle for the Connected Home”, wherein he suggests that Nest — a Lilliputian among Gullivers — needed to be acquired by Apple before it was crushed. Today we see that he was off by a few Silicon Valley miles. Why Google? Why now? Why $3.2B?
Maybe I have all the answers here in my hand. It’s right under this glass that I’m tapping and sliding my finger across. The battle over the software that will run next-generation smart phones and tablets is The Contest. The fledgling home automation market is only a qualifying event for Google vs. Apple. They are both developing contextual operating systems. A contextual O/S will be the browser of the Internet of Things era. The vision they share is that soon, when you or I walk into a space at home, at work, or during a stroll around town, our mobile devices are going to know where we are, our usual activities at that time and place, and the environmental conditions. The contextual OS will understand when we speak to it, tap into it, or communicate via gestures. And it will keep things sleek and simple, only serving up those apps that make sense in the contextual setting.
With Nest, Google acquires a brand, some products and a team with Apple-DNA to spur it along the path towards this context-aware future. Unlocking and locking physical security, brightening and dimming lights, adjusting interior temperatures — these are the first few Internet of Things (IoT) use cases with clear value to consumers. This was validated at last week’s Consumer Electronics Show.
The Apple-DNA component of the Nest brand explains the price point. Think back to the Mac vs PC ad campaign of 2006. How much would the nerdy guy pay to switch places with the cool? Google wanted the guy who designed the iPod in an attempt to subsume the entire Apple platform experience. Google has analogues to many of the key aspects of the Apple platform — Android, GoogleNow, Chromebooks, etc. But, they don’t fit together like Matryoshka dolls. Apple operates from the legacy of clear winners in every innovation category, from the Mac, to iPod, to iTunes, to iPhone, to iPad, to iOS with Siri. And, most importantly, it has a passionately engaged developer community. What are those 3 drivers the Tiger Mom is ranting about: insecurity complex, superiority complex, impulse control. Except for impulse control, I think those were the factors driving the price up.
This post is imported from an external source using a dynamic RSS feed.
If there are any issues with this content please email the BEMSchat team.